The
introduction of Christensen’s Teaching
for Joy and Justice was absolutely enjoyable. It felt good to read about a
teacher who is passionate about students and their worth. When I think of
Christensen unfortunately I cannot think of any of the teachers I have had. Also
the approach that Christensen had with teaching is the same approach that I learned
to take in a classroom in the summertime teaching at Breakthrough Providence.
We were told to create a safe space for the kids to feel comfortable enough to
be themselves much like Christensen when she says: “I must construct a classroom
where students feel safe enough to be wild and risky in their work.” That part
resonated with me so much because I think it is important to help boost
confidence and self-awareness in students so that they can be the best version
of themselves and ultimately be great citizens of the world. Also when helping
boost a student’s confidence and showing them that they matter and are
intelligent, it opens up the doors to so many risks to be better learners. Christensen’s
approach to changing the pedagogy is needed today more than ever with how fast
the world is changing around us and although academics is very important being appreciated
as a students is just as much a priority.
When
I read Gallagher I felt as though she had almost an opposite of approach of the
one Christensen did. I can understand where Gallagher is coming from because
academics is vital when it comes to moving forward as a student. Gallagher was
much more impacted by test scores and a student ability to read and right which
is good but I think that she has ignored the fact that not all students come
from the same literary experiences. When I think about Gallagher’s first
chapter I think of a more systematic approach. I recall Gallagher also
mentioning how other languages could interfere with learning when Christensen
thinks it is good to enhance those qualities of a student.
Then
there is To High School English Teachers
(And All Teachers) which for me felt like a combination of both Christensen
and Gallagher. From what I understood this blog post was about how important
English teachers are to the experience of learning. The blog post felt more
like a change in the pedagogy but to remain true to significance of literary
skills. What stuck out to me the most in the blog post was this: “we are apt to lose sight of our central
purpose in teaching English—our students.” I agree with this line because I remember
being in English classes where I would cringe from the idea of reading such “boring
books” and writing essays time after time. I do not remember ever being appreciated
for who I was and what I wrote. So much like Christensen says we need to teach
for joy and justice and like Gallagher never leave academics behind. The combination
of both authors tactics should influence the change of the pedagogy and we can
see more success from students no matter the race, class, or gender.
No comments:
Post a Comment